The Rabbit Proof Fence Analysis - 1052 Words

The playwright, No Sugar, published in 1986 and written by Jack Davis, follows the lives of the noongar Millimurra family and their determined stand against the unjust white government protection policy in Australia. The protection policy is attempting to alienate the ‘white people’ from the aboriginals, and conform them to their rules during the 1930’s. The film on the other hand, The Rabbit Proof Fence (TRPF), released in 2002 and directed by Phillip Noyce, is the suspenseful story of three young girls, Molly, Gracie, and Daisy who were torn from their home to be forced to train as domestic servants. It follows their harrowing 1,500-mile-long journey from the Moore River settlement back to their home along the rabbit proof fence. Both†¦show more content†¦Through Jimmy’s perspective, and in another argument with Mr Neville, he states that â€Å"you wetjalas don’t want us ‘ere, don’t want our kids at the same school as your ki ds†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢. The term wetjalas means a corruption of the English term ‘white fellow’, and Jimmy is pointing out to the audience that even though Mr Neville is the Chief ‘protector’ he wants to alienate himself and the white people from interacting with the aboriginal people as much as he can. Through the utilisation of the generic conventions of characterisation and emotive language, the harsh true reality of what aboriginals face every day, and how their voice is nothing compared to a white person, is shown through the Jimmy’s discriminated perspective. Phillip Noyce has employed the generic film conventions of camera angle and shot to unveil the harsh reality of racism from the discriminated perspectives of Molly, Gracie, and Daisy. During the scene of ‘Meeting Mr Neville’, a high camera angle has been used between Molly and Mr Neville to show Mr Neville’s demeaning dominance over Molly and the aboriginal people themselves. This angle makes Molly appear vulnerable and small against the stark contrast of the domineer stance Mr Neville has. When the girls were being viciously snatched away from their parents, a closeup of constable Riggs was taken. The closeup features Riggs snarling and aggressive facial features as he takesShow MoreRelatedRabbit Proof Fence Analysis985 Words   |  4 PagesThe Rabbit Proof Fence, a film by Phillip Noyce (2002) presents the story of 3 young aboriginal girls being forced away from their family to the Moore river settlement and their struggle against a white government to return t o their home along the rabbit proof fence. Noyce uses generic conventions to view the idea of racism against aborigines in Australia from a particular perspective. The perspective of an aboriginal mother a native child and a caucasian are all exhibited to prove the events ofRead MoreMovie Analysis : Rabbit Proof Fence1502 Words   |  7 Pagessee me after he failed to recapture two runaway girls. This job failure has him concerned about his daughters and his own futures, and as a result he is experiencing depression. Historical Background The movie Rabbit-Proof Fence (Noyce, 2002) based on the book Follow the Rabbit Proof Fence (Garimara, 1996), establishes the true story of the authors mother, the protagonist Molly. Both the film and novel are consistent when demonstrating key themes and ideas that occurred during the period. These themesRead MoreFilm Analysis : Rabbit Proof Fence1499 Words   |  6 Pages The Drama film Rabbit-Proof Fence, directed by Phillip Noyce, was based on the book by Doris Pilkington which retold the true story of how three young Aboriginal girls escaped the Moore River Native Settlement, after being kidnapped from home. In Western Australia, there was a government policy that would send half-caste children to this settlement to save them from themselves because they did not want a third unwanted race. Half-caste is referred to mixed-blooded children. Mr. A.O. Neville,Read MoreEssay on Kevin Rudds Apology Analysis1179 Words   |  5 PagesAnalysis: Aspect One Kevin Rudd’s apology was to the Aboriginals; but in particular, to the Stolen Generations. From 1909-1969, the Australian Government forced a policy know as assimilation upon the Aboriginals. Assimilation is the forced integration of minority groups onto the dominant society. Inhumane acts were inflicted upon these proud people because of the ‘Aborigines Protection Board’ which entailed that the Australian Government had full rights to forcibly remove half-caste children fromRead MoreColonization in Africa991 Words   |  4 PagesThey assumed that they needed to scare the Africans, so they would not try to escape. Sometimes they would try to escape, but once they were caught many Africans were killed or tortured. The European authority even took away children, like in Rabbit Proof Fence, A.O. Neville said, â€Å"The continuing infiltration of white blood finally stamps out the black color†. They were trying to teach young Africans the way of the Europea ns, to change their culture and religion. We see the Europeans trying to tellRead MoreIndigenous Australia And The Policies Imposed Upon Them1833 Words   |  8 PagesWhen dealing with such an historical event, it is essential to consider The Stolen Generation as of which â€Å"refers to those children that were forcible removed on the basis of their race alone. In contrast to the removal of non-Indigenous children, proof of neglect was not always required to remove Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children† (Aboriginal Reconciliation 2006, p.23) As a result of the query, the Bringing Them Home was published in 1997 in addition which was designed and allowed forRead MoreCitation and Reference List9582 Words   |  39 PagesReference list items are in the same order as referenced in your assignment, earliest first. Linklater (2002a) states that ... improvements of up to 80 percent have been observed (Linklater 2002b). Reference list Linklater, P. 2002a, Workflow analysis: an introduction, Faber, Sydney. Linklater, P. 2002b, ‘Enterprise content management and productivity’, Journal of Process Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1023-1047. 3.12 Use of ‘’ Use ‘and’ instead of ‘’ (ampersand), except when ‘’ isRead MoreBanana Used as Fertilizer11002 Words   |  45 Pagesfor that purpose on small farms in regions where bananas are grown. There are some concerns over the impact of  tannins  contained in the peels on animals that consume them.[3][4]  Banana peels are used as feedstock for cattle, goats, pigs, poultry, rabbits, fish and several other species. The specific nutrition contained in peel depends on the stage of maturity and the  cultivar; for example  plantain  peels contain less fibre than dessert banana peels, and  lignin  content increases with ripening (fromRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages................................................................................ 25 What is the Issue?................................................................................................................................. 28 What is a Proof?.................................................................................................................................... 30 Indicators ...................................................................................................Read MoreHemp Cultivation in China42289 Words   |  170 PagesAssociation, Volume 2, Number 2, 1995 58 DEAR MEMBERSHIP First, we owe our readers and authors an apology for all of the typographic errors and other mistakes apparent in our last issue. Because of editorial staff changes and scheduling pressures, proof-reading of that issue after its preliminary page set-up was sorely inadequate. We hope you will agree that this issue has returned the JIHA to its previous editorial standards. The 1995 VIR/IHA Cannabis Germplasm Preservation Project was again successful

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke - 1494 Words

1) Thomas Hobbes and John Locke share the basic assumption that a theory based off of abstract individualism, consent, sovereignty and reason will produce a peaceful and productive society. This theory is the liberal political theory, which is the philosophy of individual rights and a limited government. Both Hobbes and Locke both center the majority of their ideas off of how people’s lives should be based off of nature rights instead of natural law. This being said, people are also subject to the moral laws set and it is ones duty to preserve his wellbeing and strive to meet his own goals but this is where Hobbes and Locke’s theories starts to differ. According to Hobbes, he addresses his abstract individualism in the state of nature†¦show more content†¦Since John Locke is a follower of Hobbes, a lot of his theory’s stem from the same general thoughts in a state of nature. In Locke’s state of nature, men are independent, free and equal. This does come with some limitations, which are that men are at liberty to do as they please, only if they stay within the bounds of the law of nature. As for consent, Locke uses his social contract to show how the people must obey the government or the sovereign but only if the government respects the individuals within the commonwealth’s rights. These rights may be natural but also must primarily follow the moral laws of the social contract. One way Hobbes and Locke differ is with the state of war. Locke believes that all men must respect the rights of other men and it s their duty to do so even within the state of nature when all people are doing what they can to r each their goals. This duty of respecting everyone’s rights is what Locke refers to as the natural law. 2) Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both share similar ideas on the liberal political theory and how it is to be universally recognized and followed by all people and societies. They are realistic and do recognize problems that may cause problems to the system. Those problems are that not everyone will live up to the expectations they have discussed to be universally known. The two groups of people they note may break the written and unwritten laws of society are those who willingly and knowingly do,Show MoreRelatedJohn Locke And Thomas Hobbes886 Words   |  4 Pagesdiscuss the differences in political theories expressed by both John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. In, Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes, and in, The Second Treatise of Government, by John Locke different theories of political legitimacy and definitions of the state of nature are described. The following paragraphs analyze multiple different points that are imperative to understanding these political theories. In the reading, Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes discusses what human existence is in the state of nature andRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke911 Words   |  4 Pagessocial contract theory, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke established many of the founding ideals that contemporary Liberalism is based on. While the shared many similar positions, there are some key distinctions to be made between the arguments Hobbes and Locke make in Leviathan and Second Treatise of Civil Government, respectively. In this paper I will argue the differences between how each of them viewed the right of the subjects to revolt from the sovereign. Thomas Hobbes published his most famousRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke Essay1441 Words   |  6 PagesEifling-Question 4 Hobbes and Locke During and after the English Revolution, a few philosophers expressed different views on their philosophical outlook and life experiences. Some of the most outstanding thinkers include Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. They had opposing views on governance matters, but the two, also, had striking similarities. In addition, the two represented an increasingly modernized European population that despised absolute kingship. Both Hobbes and Locke proposed a conceptionRead MoreJohn Locke And Thomas Hobbes1287 Words   |  6 Pagesknow how to balance and consider the nature of humankind and their rights. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were both political philosophers who developed theories about how the government should work. They set up their theories around The Natural Law and the Social Contract Theory. Although John Locke and Thomas Hobbes had a similar goal, their beliefs and opinions were definitely not the same. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both believed in the Natural Law and the Social Contract Theory. They both developedRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1346 Words   |  6 PagesContracts Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two English political philosophers, who have had a lasting impact on modern political science. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both spent much of their lives attempting to identify the best form of government. Locke and Hobbes were among the most prominent of theorists when it came to social contract and human rights. A Social Contract is an agreement among the members of a society to cooperate for social benefits. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, are the twoRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke928 Words   |  4 Pagesthere is no formed society, government, laws, safety, etc. both Thomas Hobbes and John Locke take this into perspective while introducing a political view. As illustrated by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Karl Marx, and Friedrich Engels, they proposed political views on how human nature can prosper. Initially, Thomas Hobbes introduces a concept on the state of nature and its effects as well as how peace can be achieved. In Leviathan, Hobbes defines what living in a state of nature would be like and theRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke888 Words   |  4 Pagesare very similar but diverge in the moments that solidify their stance on their opinion. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke is both political scientist who have made strides in the area of social contracts and share being natural law theorist also. Locke and all other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal and there fore struck contracts with each other to secure safety among them. Hobbes assumed differently, thus his verdicts are very different from other natural law theoristsRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1426 Words   |  6 PagesBy the second half of the 17th Century, England would experience one of the bloodiest conflicts in its history, ultimately serving to influence some of the mo st phenomenal political philosophers in Europe --Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke. England was in constant unrest, choosing new forms of government almost on a whim in desperate attempts to restore order in the Country. The English Civil War in 1642 etched a legacy of dread in the people of England, and the war only appeared more disastrous andRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1659 Words   |  7 Pagesmajority. The following pages show how modern social contract theory especially that of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, grew into the divisive issue it is in contemporary political philosophy. Modern social contract theory can trace its roots to prominent thinkers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. It is their thoughts on social contracts that lie at the center of the many spheres we are a part of. For Hobbes and Locke, social contract theory sought to analyze the relationship between rulers and the ruledRead MoreThomas Hobbes And John Locke1361 Words   |  6 PagesThomas Hobbes and John Locke were two English thinkers in the seventeenth-century who s ideas became a key to the Enlightenment. Baron de Montesquieu and Voltaire were philosophers who applied the methods of science to understand and improve society. Thomas Hobbes believed in a powerful government. He believed people were naturally cruel, greedy, and selfish, and if they were not strictly controlled they would commit crimes and abuse one another. He believed that life with no government would be

The Value to Life Free Essays

The Value to Life; Society vs. Self Today, our society assigns the value to human life based on which life is actually more appealing to them. In other words, society places a price tag on a man’s life. We will write a custom essay sample on The Value to Life or any similar topic only for you Order Now A person is judged by society on the value of their life based on certain factors and aspects that are irrelevant. People realize the true value to their lives when they are in encounter with situations that may take it away. And because the value of life is so precious, society should determine its value in different and better ways that appreciate its value. People put more value on their lives when they come close to knocking on the doors of death. For instance, those living with  terminal illnesses  like cancer, have a whole different perception of their life and all of life in general in comparison to someone who is living a completely healthy life. In his autobiography,  Lance Armstrong  said, â€Å"When I was sick, I saw more beauty and triumph and truth in a single day than I ever did in a bike race, but they were human moments, not miraculous ones. Lance Armstrong is one of the most successful and accomplished figures in the world, yet even to him, a day of simply living one more day means more than any of his accomplishments while living with cancer. Having everything may make one value their life in greater depth but the fear of losing that everything they have worked for makes them value it even more however. While a person may assign the value to their life based on the obstacles they have overcame and learned from, s ociety’s way of determining the value to a human life is not nearly as sensitive. Society assigns the value of life under the terms of which life is actually worth more in dollars. Its unfortunate but there are too many instances in life where one person’s life is considered with higher value than others simply because of what they have and what they are willing to show for it. I remember a time when a family member of mine was rushed to the emergency room only to be turned away because he did not have any medical insurance. Does that mean his life has less value than someone who does have life insurance? He deserved to be seen by a doctor just as much as the next with or without the papers. Or in another case scenario, a young rich blonde girl of a wealthy known family becomes kidnapped on the same day as a daughter of a drug addict in the projects, who would have more publicity in the search for their return? The blonde girl’s family has more money; therefore, can afford to pay their way to more publicity time, bestowing more value on her life. It is not something that you think of everyday, or is easily realized, but our society holds value on our life only through the materialistic things. For instance, after the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001, thousands of innocent lives were lost as a result. Due to the fact that there were so many families to compensate and to prevent the airlines from going out of business, the federal government enforced a limit on how much each family would receive in compensation. These numbers were given in an article called â€Å"What Is a Life Worth? † in  Time magazine  written by Amanda Ripley. â€Å"First, the government will estimate how much a victim would have earned over his or her lifetime had the planes never crashed. That means a broker’s family will qualify for a vastly higher award than a window washer’s family. † This quote shows that in the eyes of society, the value of life is not equal because if that was the case, everyone affected from the crash would have received the same amount in compensation. The only difference between the broker and the window washer is how much money their bank account holds, but in this case, that is the only thing that matters in determining their value of life. When assigning the value of life, society overlooks the character of the person or what purpose they served in life. Since treating every man equal in America is something we try to abide our lives by, the value of someone’s life should be determined on better terms. The value of someone’s life should be determined by the merit that person has earned throughout their life. In the book of proverbs it states that â€Å"We must treat each man on his worth and merits as a man. We must see that each is given a square deal, because he is entitled to no more and should receive no less. † According to this quote, a man must be treated on his worth which is something that he must earn since every man is given the same chances and opportunities not more or less than others. When people are born, they are all given equal chances, but the different circumstances that can occur in each person’s life along the way can determine who has the ability to overcome the obstacles, making that person earn a certain merit that decides the value to their life. In conclusion, a person’s value of their own life is something that is overlooked at first. People do not realize that life is something that can be taken away so quickly that sometimes you cannot even grasp it. Life gains value when it is almost lost. When people have ragedies strike their lives, such as being diagnosed with a terminal disease, they realize how much life means to them because they feel the end approaching. They begin to realize that all their life, they have worked for something and just like that, it can be taken away. Our society plays a large role in how value is put on life. Society determines the value of life unfairly and none biased on the emotional aspects a life may pert ain. Society judges a human life based on their materialistic earnings rather than their merit earnings. A rich man’s life is more valuable than a poor man’s under the rules of society. How to cite The Value to Life, Essay examples